Author: tommyroma

NAPS Executive Board Teleconference Minutes – November 14, 2012

NAPS HQ held its first Post NAPS/USPS Consultative Executive Board teleconference to review and discuss the responses from the USPS regarding NAPS’s November 14 2013 NAPS/USPS Consultative agenda items. President Atkins briefed the Executive Board on the following agenda items. (Note: November 2012 Consultative Minutes will be sent to Executive Board)

          1. The status of the recommendations of the Fact Finding panel pertaining to eight EAS positions under review for potential upgrades.

          2. An update on the current closure and consolidation plan of plants for 2013 & 2014.

          3. Current status of the new SWCs model being implemented to the field.

          4. NAPS would like an update on the remaining impacted employees in the field.

          5. NAPS would like an update on the posting of vacant positions in the field.

Click here for full Teleconference Minutes.

NAPS/USPS Consultative Meeting Minutes – November 14, 2012

1. As a result of the recommendations of the Fact Finding panel, NAPS and the USPS agreed that an evaluation of the following positions would be undertaken for proper leveling:

                    Supervisor, Maintenance Operations
                    Supervisor, Maintenance
                    Supervisor, Transportation
                    Manager, Transportation
                    Mail Flow Controller
                    Supervisor, Vehicle Maintenance
                    Manager, Vehicle Maintenance
                    Operations Support Specialist

NAPS would like to be briefed on the status of the evaluations of these positions.

USPS Response:  USPS Organizational Effectiveness (OE) has completed the evaluations on the above EAS positions. The OE Office will brief Deborah Giannoni-Jackson VicePresident, Employee Resource Management; and Anthony Vegliante, Chief Human Resources Executive Vice President, next week on the evaluation findings.

There is no specific date set on when NAPS will receive a final decision from USPS HQ regarding the above agenda item. However, NAPS expects a decision soon after the Giannoni-Jackson and Vegliante briefing.

2. NAPS has been advised from the field that there have been changes in the restructuring plans that are moving Plant closures and consolidations from 2013 to 2014.

At our October, 2012 Consultative Meeting we requested an update on the consolidation plans and were advised that there was no information available for release. Once again we are requesting that updates on closures and consolidations be provided to NAPS at the same time the decisions are made that cause a change in plans. We request an update on the current closure and consolidation plans.

USPS Response: After NAPS had submitted this agenda item, NAPS headquarters had contacted COO Megan Brennan on this issue. Therefore, this consultative meeting will not address this issue, since it is already being addressed by Ms. Brennan’s office.

Click here for full Consultative Meeting Minutes.

NAPS/USPS Consultative Meeting Minutes – October 18, 2012

1. NAPS would like to be briefed on the projected Plant closings and consolidations now under development for 2013 and 2014. We would like to be provided with a spreadsheet that shows all changes and the Plants that will be gaining the workload from the closing or consolidations of workload in Processing & Distribution.

USPSResponse: The report is under development and the USPS will give to NAPS when available. It is constantly changing. NAPS is requesting an updated list, but nothing has been finalized.

NAPS understands things are in flux, but local management is telling members they are impacted, but we need to know if the USPS is looking or not looking at a plant. NAPS stated it would be good to know the plants involved to let our members know if their facility is under review. We have had instances where members are called in with EAP present, but not sure what is happening. Then members find out it is a restructure. There are facilities that are not closing but the structure is changing, so they are starting a RIF on the staffing changes, though the facility is not closing or consolidating.

USPS Response: A person who is officially impacted will be notified with a General RIF letter on November 6, 2012. In addition, the originally “potentially impacted” list of EAS was 3,029. USPS stated that there is no prohibition to take laterals, from impacted or non-impacted EAS.
 

2. NAPS would like an update on the implementation of EAS restructuring in the Network Distribution Centers. Although our briefings have indicated that the plan has been approved for implementation, we are being advised that the changes that are involved in the restructuring have not been implemented in the field.

USPS Response: The NDC changes were implemented on the same time line as the Plant Consolidations. USPS made all organizational changes on the NDC’s. The USPS went over the process and timeline with all NDC parties involved.

NAPS stated that there are Operation Support Specialists (OSS’s) in NDC’s that have not been told they are impacted or where they are to report. Though USPS HQ’s work appears to be done, the field it is not accomplishing their work. Nothing is being done in the NDCs to help impacted EAS be placed.

Click here for full Consultative Meeting Minutes.

No new buyouts on Postal Service horizon

No new buyouts on Postal Service horizon

federalnewsradiologo

 

Thursday – 11/8/2012, 8:10am ET

By Julia Ziegler
Federal News Radio                                                                                                             

After three separate buyouts in 2012, the U.S. Postal Service says it has no plans for any new offers in the foreseeable future.

“Right now, we have all our plans in place,” Anthony Vegliante, the agency’s chief human resources officer, told Federal News Radio. “So I don’t see anything other than to focus on completing, making the transition, and getting our employees in the right place.”

In an exclusive interview on Federal News Radio’s Agency of the Month show, Vegliante said he expects the number of buyouts taken by Postal Service employees to total 23,000 – 27,000 by the end of January.

He said 4,200 postmasters accepted buyouts after an offer released in May, while 3,000 were accepted by mail handlers under an agreement with the National Postal Mail Handlers Union. In October, USPS put another buyout on the table for approximately 115,000 members of the American Postal Workers Union. Vegliante said he expects 16,000 – 20,000 employees to take that offer.

If the projections hold, the Postal Service’s career workforce will drop to about 500,000 employees by the beginning of 2013 — its lowest level since 1966.

While the agency has no more plans for buyouts in the near future, it does plan to continue shrinking the size of its workforce. The agency has said it would like to have closer to 400,000 employees by 2016. In addition to the 25,000 – 30,000 people who retire each year due to normal attrition, Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe said he expects to lose another 35,000 – 40,000 employees if the agency moves to five-day delivery. Congress, however, has yet to pass the legislation needed to allow that.

Vegliante said the number of buyouts has allowed the Postal Service to avoid reductions in force, known as RIFs, for the most part.

      buyoutphoto

“The fact that we’ve RIF’d very few people is because we have a rigorous RIF- avoidance process, meaning we offer voluntary early retirements, we offer incentives, we offer the opportunity for people to move to other jobs and other locations. … When you get voluntary participation versus forced participation things go a lot smoother. People get choice, which we’re fine with people having choices.”

While jobs are being cut due to consolidation throughout the agency, Vegliante said USPS is doing everything it can to take care of its employees who aren’t ready to leave the Postal Service.

“In our collective bargaining process, we have a provision, which we implement, which allows us to reassign people to other facilities doing the same work or to other crafts doing different work within their own and other facilities. So, we have a pretty well-established process where we move people around to where the work is.”

Despite the significant drop in the size of its workforce, Vegliante said the Postal Service is still getting its job done.

“I don’t really have a concern about work falling between the cracks. And the reason I say that is because the Postal Service is probably at an all-time high of delivery service to its customers,” Vegliante said. “Our customer satisfaction measurements are all increasing. Our productivity has been solid for the last decade. … I believe we have the management team in place, the processes which keep us focused on what’s important. Obviously, at the end of the day, service to the customers and the indicators are what tell you whether you’re doing good or bad.”

Employee Reaction

Vegliante said employees understand USPS needs to make changes in order to deal with declining mail volume and how Americans are now utilizing the Postal Service.

“People are telling us, ‘We understand what’s going on. We understand the need to do certain things. We need to do it.’ I can appreciate that because if you’re the one that’s subject to change, once you understand it, once you accept it, you want it to happen.”

However, Vegliante said, he also recognizes that change isn’t easy.

“Any time you change, people perceive it to be unnecessary. There’s an old adage, ‘The only person who likes change is the one who thought of it.’ You have to overcome that.”

That’s especially true if that change means a job reassignment in a new location with different work hours.

“It’s not going to make [me] happy if I work 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. four blocks from where I live and now I have to work 3:30 p.m. to 12 a.m., 20 miles away. I don’t have a fix for that. But, the one thing I’m very comfortable with, we always have been able to find jobs for our employees.”

Priorities

In addition to overseeing the consolidation of the Postal Service’s workforce and keeping an eye on labor costs, Vegliante said he is also focused on the agency’s succession planning initiatives.

“One of my most important tasks this past year and going forward into the future is leadership, talent and development,” Vegliante said. “We have a lot of people in higher-level positions that are closer to the end of their career than they are the beginning of their career. Not that any particular person is going to leave, but you want a strong bench, you want people ready to step up.”

Vegliante, himself, has been with the Postal Service for more than 30 years. He began his career as a distribution clerk in New Haven, Conn., in 1978. In 2010, he was named a fellow at the National Academy of Human Resources — the first public sector employee ever to be given the distinction. According to the organization’s website, fellows are those who “have made sustained and exemplary contributions to the broad field of human resources and to their organizations and communities” and “have played a substantial role in shaping human resource management thinking and policy.”

 

Copyright © 2012 by Federal News Radio. All rights reserved.

Thank You from Kirstin Gillibrand

Thank You from Kirstin Gillibrand

Thomas,

Last night was an important night for our country, from re-electing President Obama to sending men and women to the Senate who will work across the aisle, find common ground and end the partisan gridlock.

We did this because people like you worked for it and voted for it.

From the bottom of my heart, I can’t thank you enough for the honor and privilege of continuing to fight for New York families in the U.S. Senate.

We have a lot of work to do. Our state is still in great crisis. Communities across New York, in New York City, Long Island and the Lower Hudson Valley, are still recovering. Even with unprecedented federal response, people are still hurting. Lives have been shattered. Homes destroyed.

We will rebuild. When we face down challenges, we always rise to them. It’s because we believe something both simple and profound: “We’re all in this together.”

Today we go back to work. And I know, because of you, we’re up for any task.

Thank you. Not just for being there for me, but for our friends and neighbors here in New York.

Sincerely,
Kirsten

 

kirsten gillibrand

How This Happened – Email from President Obama

How This Happened – Email from President Obama

Tommy —

I’m about to go speak to the crowd here in Chicago, but I wanted to thank you first.

I want you to know that this wasn’t fate, and it wasn’t an accident. You made this happen.

You organized yourselves block by block. You took ownership of this campaign five and ten dollars at a time. And when it wasn’t easy, you pressed forward.

I will spend the rest of my presidency honoring your support, and doing what I can to finish what we started.

But I want you to take real pride, as I do, in how we got the chance in the first place.

Today is the clearest proof yet that, against the odds, ordinary Americans can overcome powerful interests.

There’s a lot more work to do.

But for right now: Thank you.

Barack

untitled

We Still Believe

We Still Believe

Jay Killackey
Executive Vice President

Last year NAPS lost one of its best, Andrew Sozzi, our former Northeast Region Vice President. Andy was beloved by many in our organization. As much as the leadership of NAPS was familiar with Andy, what most of you don’t know about Andy, I want to share with you during this holiday season for Andy was a special person in the eyes of some of the neediest kinds in New York.

During his life, Andy was the cornerstone of the New York Post Office’s “Operation Santa” program where he donned a big red suit and greeted needy children whose only hope for a happy holiday was the generosity and caring of postal employees and citizens of New York who donated their time and gifts to make the Christmas holiday a little brighter for those less fortunate. Andy’s large girth made him a logical candidate for the job, but even more it was the size of his heart that made him perfect for the job.

Andy was always a giving and caring person. As an only child, he committed his time to caring for his widowed mother. Not having a family of his own, he adopted hundreds of children every year as he greeted children who longed to meet Santa and ask for something special for Christmas. The Operation Santa program has had the daunting task of accepting and reviewing upwards of 30,000 requests for assistance in an average holiday season. This put a great strain on organizing and collection donations of cash and gifts, but it was a labor of love for the employees of the New York Post Office.

After a long day at work, Andy would so enjoy donning “the suit” to greet wide-eyed children and attempt to make their wishes come true. Anyone who knew Andy was aware that he liked the temperature cool and he regularly built up a thick sweat when he was forced to wear a suite and tie for work. It didn’t matter how hot that Santa suit got as Andy worked the long line of children anxious to see Santa and hear his bellowing laugh and the warmth of his hugs.

Looking at the material from those happy days with Santa provided from his friends in the New York Post Office caused me to reminisce about the man that we thought we already knew and brought a new dimension to his memory.

Throughout the country, post offices are sponsoring Operation Santa programs every year. Perhaps you might consider checking in with the group in your hometown to see if there is something that you can do in Andy’s memory to make Christmas a little brighter for a child less fortunate.

Winter Board Meeting

Having just returned from our winter board meeting at NAPS Headquarters, I was quite frankly surprised at some of the motions the board entertained. Most notably, a resolution from Utah to buy the three resident officers condos while they are in office, which was soundly defeated by the body at the convention, was re-introduced by a Board member at our meeting. In attempting to explain why he was re-introducing the motion, he alleged that the membership was not fully informed about the resolution at the convention.

Needless to say, the motion failed again. Two of the three resident officers voted No because they realize that it’s not right to go against the vote of the convention body. While some on the Board are persisting on wanting to purchase the condos, the motion was again defeated. One resident officer voted YES and the other two abstained, or refrained from voting, which was quite different from the first vote.

Members persisting who spoke in favor of the motion stated that, at a cost of 2.1 million dollars, it would be a good investment for NAPS. They cited NAPS’ purchase of our Headquarters building as an example. However, that is not a valid comparison. Our building was purchased for somewhat over 3 million dollars, which much less than its actual value at the time. The ideal circumstance had presented itself because the builder had defaulted, as had the bank which had financed it. When NAPS purchased it in the early 90s under the leadership of Vince Palladino, it was purchased from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), which was quite anxious to get it off its hands. Additionally, Vince often recounted how, when NAPS showed up at the auction, we were the only ones who seemed to have the money needed to buy. Consequently, NAPS ended up with all four floors, whereas the original intention had been to purchase only one.

Those in favor of purchasing the condos contend that while the resident officers are serving NAPS, they would be required to pay $1,600.00 a month rent. Do the math: at that rate, it would take 46 years to pay for the condos. While I don’t think that investments that benefit NAPS are a bad thing, I know that I will never go against the membership wishes. I definitely will continue to vote NO on this issue. The board member who wants to vote Yes should not attempt to use the executive board to obtain, through the “back door” method, approval of a resolution that was defeated by the membership at the convention.

Jimmy Warden and I have been investigating the contracts of Martin Communications our publisher of the Postal Supervisor and soon to be ex-event planner for NAPS conventions. His last convention will be in 2014 at San Diego California. After examining all paperwork and bills submitted by Martin Communications we found a lot of irregularities. Our findings were turned over to the 3 resident officers at NAPS. They agreed to gather questions from the board to ask Ray Martin to try to find answers. This did not happen as they turned the questions over to him and he had to answer to the board. Jimmy and I led the charge with questions that Ray Martin did not answer correctly or could not answer at all, using such terms as “there were a few OVERSIGHTS,” “I DON’T REMEMBER,” “ABSOLUTELY NOT,” and other similar, evasive non- answers.

Our comparison check with another large printing firm using the NAPS bills submitted by Martin communications resulted in a finding that he has been overcharging us by 10-40%. When asked about this, Mr. Martin told me a contract is a contract and if I disagreed, I should get my lawyer and he will get his. To my surprise a board member who I had considered a friend, accused me of being unprofessional and having gone “over the top” in order to get answers. In my opinion I did not go over the top, what I was trying to do was get answers from someone who was not being truthful. The investigation will continue until we can get the truth.

–Tommy Roma